Further clarification on our lawsuit against Promise Technologies

I would like to further clarify two points with regard to Carbonite’s lawsuit against Promise Technologies:

1) This event happened over a year ago. We do not say this to minimize the matter. But we do want to point out that this has not happened in a long time and is not an ongoing problem.

2) The total number of Carbonite customers who were unable to retrieve their data was 54, not 7,500.

Here is what happened: The Promise servers that we were purchasing in 2006 and 2007 use RAID technology to spread data redundantly across 15 disk drives so that if any one disk drive fails, you don't lose any data. The RAID software that makes all this work is embedded as "firmware" in the storage servers. In this case, we believe that the firmware on the servers had bugs that caused the servers to crash. Carbonite automatically restarted all 7,500 backups and more than 99% of these were completely restored without incident. Statistically, about 2 out of every 1,000 consumer hard drives will crash every week, so 54 of these customers had their PCs crash before their re-started backups were complete. Since they weren’t completely backed up when their PCs crashed, these customers were unable to restore all of their files from Carbonite. Most of the 54 got some or most of their data back. We took full responsibility for what happened and I did my best to call each of these customers personally to apologize.

As a result of our problems with the Promise servers, we switched to a popular Dell server that uses RAID6 – an improved RAID that allows for the loss of 3 of the 15 drives simultaneously before you lose any data. This configuration is in theory 36 million times more reliable than a single disk drive — the chances of 3 out of 15 drives failing at the same time are almost nil.

So far, Promise has refused to accept responsibility for their equipment’s failures, so now we are suing them to get our money back. The Dell RAID servers have been flawless and we're extremely happy with them. Dave Friend, CEOCarbonite, Inc.

Dave
CEO, Carbonite

Related posts

Comments

March 24. 2009 23:48

Tim Layton

I received an email from Dave Friend today regarding a post on my technical blog (http://techtips.timlaytonllc.com). I had written a brief article about the loss of data for 7,500 carbonite.com customers. I first learned of the data loss via my Twitter feed (twitter.com/timlaytonsr) and then I performed a google search confirming the story. All of the various stories basically read the same so I felt comfortable publishing my article based on the vast number of what I believed to be reliable sources that I found via the web.

After reading Dave's email in detail we exchanged several conversations back and forth. I quickly realized that I had not gotten the full story via the many sources that I used to research my article.

I have lived long enough to realize that there are usually two sides to every pancake. It is very unfortunate when hard-working reliable organizations like Carbonite experience negative and damaging press when all of the facts were clearly not reported by the masses.

I am writing today to offer my humble apology to Dave Friend and the Carbonite team. I learned a valuable lesson today--so thank you. I hope that you accept my sincere apology and I want you and your team to know that I remain a loyal customer of Carbonite and plan to remain one. I have removed the original article off of my blog and I have written a new update earlier today (http://tinyurl.com/dhqjwb).

Dave, I wish you are your team the best.

Regards,

Tim Layton

Tim Layton

March 31. 2009 02:50

PK

OK, here's a stupid question. I'm sorry, but I'm gonna be brutally honest. I have extensive enterprise systems experience and if you guys are in the backup business, you should be looking at geographically dispersed SAN solutions. You shouldn't be messing around with Dell Servers. So how can I trust my backups to a company that can't even keep a system up? You guys had downtime (server unavailable) and didn't even bother to put up a page or send an email to customers. I spent all morning wondering what was wrong when I finally chatted with someone from your customer support site that didn't even know this was a problem. When I asked when the issue would be resolved, I was told 24-48 hours.

Uhm.. This is unacceptable. I would suggest you guys contact me with a damn good explanation or I will be writing an article on my blog and calling my credit card company for a chargeback.

I'm sorry I'm even writing this, but a backup company shouldn't have downtime and it honestly scares the crap outta me that you guys are messing with Promise and Dell. You should be using blade servers and SAN technologies.

This is a typical case of a PC Tech who thought he/she had a technology clue and bills a system as enterprise-class when it's clearly nowhere near it.

PK

April 25. 2009 21:46

Rhinoback Online Backup

We also had serious problems with Promise RAID technology. Controllers failed without warning on more than one occasion. Fortunately we had all of our customer data replicated to other storage systems and did not lose any data. These problems occurred over two years ago and we also switched to much more reliable HP SAN Storage systems with RAID 6. I completely understand your comments about spending enormous amounts of time dealing with these issues.

Rhinoback Online Backup

May 4. 2009 14:44

pingback

Pingback from yeraze.com

Online Backup Followup: Carbonite | Yeraze's Domain 3.0

yeraze.com

Comments are closed